RX Alert
|
|
Gardasil (HPV) Side Effects Dangerous |
|
|
|
|
RX Alert
|
|
Thursday, 24 September 2009 20:12 |
|
The summer of 2009 revealed two inconvenient truths about vaccination. First, the Gardasil vaccine is not as safe as the government, medical organizations and Merck have said it is. Second, the H1N1 influenza pandemic is not as serious as health officials are telling you it is. One in every 1,855 Gardasil shots is followed by a bad health outcome report to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. These bad health outcomes reported after Gardasil shots include lots of girls suddenly passing out and having seizures. There is also a greater than expected rate of reported blood clots. In fact, four girls have died after they developed a blood clot that traveled to their lungs after Gardasil vaccination. Apparently, the government can let vaccine manufacturers fast track the Gardasil vaccine, but can’t compel the drug company that makes the vaccine, or doctors giving it, to report each and every death and serious injury that follows vaccination. Why believe anything government health officials tell us about the safety of vaccines? Why believe that the experimental swine flu vaccines being fast tracked with only a few weeks of study are going to be safe, and that all vaccine reactions will be reported to the government and then properly followed up? It is far more likely that, when children get swine flu vaccine in schools and then get really sick or even die like the Gardasil girls, that all those bad health outcomes will be written off as a coincidence by health officials. That is, if any reports are made to the government at all -- few school nurses or other people giving children swine flu vaccines in the schools will be taking medical histories, much less monitoring children for signs of a vaccine reaction and then filing a reaction report to the government. It is time to demand that government officials and drug companies stop conducting national vaccine experiments on the American people. Sources: National Vaccine Information Center August 24, 2009
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 24 September 2009 20:23 |
|
|
Aspirin: It kills 20,000 Americans every year |
|
|
|
|
RX Alert
|
|
Tuesday, 01 September 2009 00:00 |
|
Reference: wddty.com Common over-the-counter painkillers such as aspirin kill around 20,000 Americans every year, and another 100,000 end up in hospital as a result of taking the drug, new research reveals.
 Painkillers known as NSAIDs (non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs) are far more dangerous than people have been told, and can cause life-threatening gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, stomach perforations and ulcers.
More than 14 million Americans regularly take an NSAID for their arthritis pain alone, and around 60 per cent of these will suffer gastrointestinal side effects – and will probably never blame the drug, researchers from the Eastern Virginia Medical School estimate.
Researchers realized that patients weren’t associating the painkiller with their stomach problems when they carried out a survey among patients at a clinic that specialises in gastrointestinal disease. Around one in five of the patients was taking an NSAID such as an aspirin, and was not reporting the fact to medical staff because they didn’t regard it as significant.
“This reflects a common misperception that these medications are insignificant or benign when actually their chronic use, particularly among the elderly and those with conditions such as arthritis, is linked to serious and potentially fatal GI injury and bleeding,” said Dr David Johnson, one of the researchers.
(Source: Proceedings of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, October 15, 2007).
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 06 September 2009 01:52 |
|
"Hundreds Dead" in Failed Diabetes Drug Trial |
|
|
|
|
RX Alert
|
|
Tuesday, 01 September 2009 00:00 |
(NaturalNews) The National Institutes of Health's (NIH) National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute has announced the early cancellation of one part of a major diabetes and cardiovascular disease study after discovering that patients undergoing that treatment were more likely to die from heart attacks and strokes.
The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study included 10,251 adults with Type 2 diabetes who were considered to be at especially high risk of heart attacks and strokes. One of the treatments in the study involved using combinations of FDA-approved diabetes drugs to aggressively lower participants' blood sugar to levels as close to normal as possible.
"Of these, 257 in the intensive treatment group have died, compared with 203 within the standard treatment group," the NIH announced. At the time of the experiment's cancellation, patients had been undergoing treatment for an average of four years.
The NIH said that it does not know what caused the increased risk of death among patients undergoing intensive treatment, but it does not believe that the risk came from any individual drug or combination of drugs. Rather, there appears to be some negative effect on the body from so aggressively lowering blood sugar levels.
"This presents a real dilemma to patients and their physicians," said Richard Kahn, chief scientific and medical officer for the American Diabetes Association. "How intensive should treatment be? We just don't know."
Previously, health experts have believed that the closer to normal a diabetic's blood sugar can be lowered, the better. The NIH findings have offered a major challenge to that conventional wisdom.
Approximately 21 million people in the United States suffer from Type 2 diabetes, and the numbers increase every year. The elevated blood sugar that is characteristic of the disease is well-established to lead to a host of other health problems, including an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, heart attack and stroke.
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 08 February 2009 19:01 |
|
|
Prolonged use of HRT increases breast cancer risks, researchers warn |
|
|
|
|
RX Alert
|
|
Tuesday, 01 September 2009 00:00 |
|
Women who use HRT for three years or more face a higher risk of developing a certain type of breast cancer, say researchers. A study says combined HRT - which includes two hormones - carries a threefold extra risk for developing lobular tumours, which form in the milk-producing glands and account for about 15 per cent of all breast cancer cases. This type of cancer tends to be more easily treated, however, and is less likely to be fatal. Dr Christopher Li, who led the U.S. study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, said: "Previous research indicated that five or more years of combined hormone therapy was necessary to increase overall breast cancer risk. "Our study suggests that a significantly shorter exposure may confer an increased risk." The research follows conflicting findings on the side effects of long-term use of hormone replacement therapy, which is used to ease the symptoms of the menopause. In 2002, the U.S. Women's Health Initiative claimed that women using HRT were at higher risk of heart disease and strokes. The findings were revised, however, in later analysis which showed they applied to women taking HRT for the first time in their 60s and 70s, later than is usual in the UK. In 2003 a British study found a higher risk of breast cancer in women taking HRT for more than five years. There have since been claims by U.S. experts of a fall in new breast cancer cases because women have given up HRT. Before the scares, an estimated 1.7million British women were using HRT to replace oestrogen lost at the menopause. There are now around a million fewer users. Existing guidance to doctors says women should take HRT for the shortest time possible, but that it is effective to combat symptoms of the menopause. The latest study, published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, comes as experts say the incidence of lobular cancer - more difficult to detect by clinical examination and X-rays - is on the rise. Dr Li said: "Our research suggests that the use of postmenopausal HRT, specifically combined preparations, may be contributing to this." Dr John Stevenson, consultant metabolic physician at the Royal Brompton Hospital London and chairman of Women Health Concern, said the study's findings were similar to some others, but there was also research showing no extra risk of breast cancer with three years' use. He said: "Women taking HRT do not need to see their doctor or take any additional action."
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 28 September 2009 21:40 |
|
FDA Investigates Singular Suicide Connection |
|
|
|
|
RX Alert
|
|
Tuesday, 01 September 2009 00:00 |
|
ALBANY, NY -- Cody Miller was only 15 when he took his life last August. His parents believe it was the result of an allergy medication, Singulair, prescribed two weeks before his death. The Millers have waged a battle to get the Food and Drug Administration to take a closer look at the medication and improve the warning label. Now, they're finding vindication. The F.D.A. is formally investigating the potential link between Singulair and suicide. After his death Cody's mom, Kate, learned of reports of a possible link between the drug and suicide. She began asking questions and filed a report with the F.D.A. by October the drug maker, Merck, had updated it's warning but product on store shelves still had old package inserts and doctors and pharmacists hadn't been notified about the update. For the Miller's the fight was on. "There's gotta be some information out there and they have to have had a lot of feedback. It's time to take notice, to be a good corporate citizen and do the right thing. It's lives we're talking about," Kate Miller said. The F.D.A is now asking patients who've taken Singulair if they've had bad reactions to the drug. They're asking those who have to post it on their website. Source: firstcoastnews.com
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 22 February 2009 05:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|